Ethics review and use of reminder letters in postal surveys: are current practices compromising an evidence-based approach?

Jeanette E Ward
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05044.x
Published online: 6 January 2003

Comment: Howell and his coauthors invite human research ethics committees (HRECs) to standardise their judgements about key aspects of methods, such as response-aiding strategies.1 Their balanced and thoughtful analysis of their experience in securing approval from two HRECs for reminders to enhance response rates to a postal community survey adds to previous concerns about decision-making by HRECs in Australia.2,3

  • Jeanette E Ward



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.