EBM — a moral imperative

Wendy A Rogers
Med J Aust 2004; 180 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05757.x
Published online: 26 August 2003

A series of well-informed chapters engage with some of the major criticisms of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Issues such as flawed research, redundant publishing, publication bias, and the shortcomings of research synthesis are tackled squarely. Despite these problems, argues Goodman, the use of research is well founded both conceptually and practically, creating the imperative to improve the quality of research production and synthesis rather than abandon EBM. The only weakness in his reasoning is the lack of evidence that using EBM leads to better patient outcomes, or discussion of how this might be demonstrated.

  • Wendy A Rogers



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.