Painting the picture: Australasian medical student views on wellbeing teaching and support services

James M Hillis, William R G Perry, Emily Y Carroll, Belinda A Hibble, Marion J Davies and Justin Yousef
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (4): 188-190. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03476.x
Published online: 15 February 2010

There is a growing body of evidence that medical students experience disproportionate levels of stress-related impairment. Before commencing medical school, their mental wellbeing is similar to that of the general student population.1-3 However, as they progress through their training, in an environment of multifactorial stressors, medical students exhibit lower psychological wellbeing than age-matched peers and the general population.4-9 Within the first year alone, there is a significant increase from baseline in the prevalence of stress, depression and burnout.10 These levels remain high throughout medical school,2,11 resulting in lower life satisfaction by the time students reach their final year.12

It has been reported that 24% of first-year and second-year medical students are depressed, of whom 26% have suicidal ideation, but only 22% have used mental health services.13 Identified barriers to accessing support include confidentiality concerns, stigma, poor service availability and difficulty in gaining access to care.13

Coping mechanisms learnt at medical school affect students’ long-term health and the quality of care they provide to patients.14-17 Stress and distress may also impair academic performance,18 and increase cynicism, academic dishonesty14 and the prevalence of suicidal ideation or suicide.19

Few studies have explored the teaching of wellbeing, and there is little consensus about what should be included in a wellbeing curriculum. This study aimed to identify students’ access to and awareness of support services, and their perceptions on the teaching of wellbeing and its relevance.


We developed a survey to investigate students’ experiences and perceptions of their wellbeing. It was reviewed by university academic staff and representatives of wellbeing awareness organisations. Response modes included yes/no options and five-point Likert scales (from 1 [strongly disagree] to 5 [strongly agree]). Identical hard-copy and online versions of the survey were used. The online version was hosted on the website of the relevant national medical students’ association. Both versions were completed anonymously.

Medical students enrolled at five universities in Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete the questionnaire in November 2007. Final-year students at one university completed the questionnaire during a lecture. All other students were informed of the online questionnaire via student email lists.

Statistical analysis

Results were collated and SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill, USA) was used for analyses comparing students by entry type (international, local graduate and local school leaver), sex (female and male) and stage of study (preclinical and clinical students). Few international graduate students responded, so data from international students was not separated into graduate and school-leaver students. Missing responses were treated as absent data in all analyses. Three entry type by two sex by two stage of study univariate and multivariate analyses of variance (general linear model) were used for all rating scales, while χ2 tests were used for categorical data. Significant differences between entry types that could be attributed to differences between universities are not reported.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Monash University Standing Committee on Ethics in Research involving Humans (#2007001948EA), University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (#07/198), Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee, University of Melbourne Health Sciences Human Ethics Subcommittee (#0721504) and University of Tasmania Human Research Ethics Committee (#H9831).


Of a total 5072 students, 1328 (26%) responded. Fifty-four per cent were clinical students and 64% were female. Fifteen per cent of respondents were international students, 26% were local graduates and 60% were local school-leaver students. The distribution by entry type, sex and stage of study was consistent with the study cohort at each university.

Support services

Our findings on students’ experiences of support services, including significant differences between student entry type, sex or stage of study, are summarised in Box 1. Of the 71% of students aware of support services at their university, fewer than half felt support services were adequately promoted and about half had either used them or knew someone who had. About three-quarters of students felt comfortable seeking support services offered within and outside their university. Seventy per cent of all students had their own general practitioner, but this proportion dropped to 45% for international students (P < 0.001).


Fifty-five per cent of students agreed or strongly agreed that there was a stigma attached to being a medical student undergoing stress and distress. Seventy-two per cent agreed or strongly agreed that there was a stigma attached to being a medical student diagnosed with a mental health condition. International male students were most likely to perceive a stigma associated with undergoing stress and distress (F[2, 1320] = 4.27; P = 0.014). There were no other significant differences between entry type, sex or stage of study.

Wellbeing curriculum

Fifty-six per cent of students believed that they had formal teaching on medical student stress and distress. Of these students, 55% agreed or strongly agreed that there was sufficient curriculum time allocated to the topic, and 54% agreed or strongly agreed that it was approached in an appropriate way.

Students were asked seven questions about which topics of medical student stress and distress they would benefit most from learning about (Box 2). Helping somebody else cope with stress and distress was considered the most beneficial, and medical background of stress and distress the least beneficial. Students were asked a further four questions about which modes of teaching on stress and distress they would participate in (Box 2); they were most likely to attend a curriculum lecture and least likely to attend a lecture outside the course.


At the time of the survey, all medical schools involved offered support services, yet only 71% of students were aware of these services, and fewer than half of these thought they were adequately promoted. Clinical students, who are based off campus, were most likely to feel this way. These results highlight the need for greater promotion, awareness, and education about the services available, with a particular focus on the clinical years.

It was concerning that only 45% of international students had their own GP. International graduate students encounter cultural and language barriers, social isolation and financial hardship,20,21 and are known to have unsupported mental health requirements.22 We also found that international students are more likely to feel uncomfortable accessing help outside the university. This study indicates that international students need additional help to establish a relationship with a GP.

Our findings reinforce the importance of addressing stigma. Medical schools should actively counter the perception of stigma associated with mental health issues. Three methods of doing so have been identified — education, protest, and contact.23 Examples of these in the medical school setting include informing medical students about the reality of mental health issues within the profession; countering beliefs that bolster stigma, such as resultant academic jeopardy (the belief that seeking support will adversely affect academic standing and references);24 and facilitating medical students hearing of the experiences of senior colleagues who had undergone stress or had a mental health experience.

Only 56% of students believed that they had formal teaching on stress and distress, and only half of these students felt that the subject had sufficient time allocated and was approached appropriately. The Australian Medical Council (AMC), which accredits Australian and New Zealand medical schools, states: “The medical curriculum should specifically address issues of self-care, doctor health and the responsibility to identify and assist peers in distress”.25 Medical schools thus have an obligation to address these statistics by increasing or altering the way wellbeing is taught within their curricula. In doing so, they must prioritise its place within the curriculum and the development of its content.

There is no absolute consensus on what should be taught in wellbeing curricula. We found that student learning priorities were: helping others cope with stress and distress, identifying when others are experiencing stress or distress, and self-help techniques for coping with stress and distress. These align with AMC standards.25 Further research is required, in particular, to test the effectiveness of curriculum interventions.

We surveyed over a thousand students across five medical schools in two countries. A weakness of our study was the low response rate. There was possible selection bias. Sample bias was unlikely, as the demographic characteristics of the respondents reflected those of the student population.

The results of our survey reinforce the need for medical schools to ensure that student wellbeing receives appropriate attention. An integrated approach of curriculum inclusion and adequate support services provision is required to avoid the potential ill effects of low personal wellbeing.

1 Students’ experiences of support services*

Student entry type


Stage of study

Survey statement





P (χ2)



P (χ2)

Pre- clinical


P (χ2)

Aware of support services








  • If “yes”, services promoted adequately








< 0.001


  • Have used or know someone who has used services




< 0.001






    • If “yes”, satisfied with services






    • Services culturally appropriate






Comfortable seeking services offered by university









Comfortable seeking services outside of university





0.001 (13.82)







< 0.001


Have general practitioner





< 0.001 (64.27)









* Values represent percentage of students agreeing with the survey statement. Omitted results contain differences attributable to differences between universities. Statistics are only provided for significant differences.

2 Wellbeing teaching topics and teaching modes preferred by students

* For whether students feel they would benefit from learning about that aspect of stress and distress.
 For whether students would attend or like to receive that mode of wellbeing teaching.

Received 20 April 2009, accepted 7 September 2009

  • James M Hillis1,2
  • William R G Perry3,4
  • Emily Y Carroll5
  • Belinda A Hibble6
  • Marion J Davies7
  • Justin Yousef1

  • 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Australian Medical Students’ Association, Canberra, ACT.
  • 3 University of Otago, Dunedin, NZ.
  • 4 New Zealand Medical Students’ Association, Wellington, NZ.
  • 5 Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
  • 6 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 7 University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS.



We acknowledge the contributions of Ben Canny, Agnes Dodds, Mary-Leigh Moore, Kate Reid, Eleanor Flynn, Geoff McColl, Susan Elliott, Helen Schultz, Kerry Breen, Mark Schwartz, Nick Tolhurst, Anne Martin, David Prideaux and Steven Lockwood in developing the questionnaire, obtaining ethics approval and analysing the results. We thank the Australian and New Zealand Medical Students’ Associations for supporting this survey throughout the research process. We received a 2007/2008 Monash Neuroscience and Mental Health Network Vacation Scholarship, Rural Workforce Agency Victoria Student Grant, University of Melbourne School of Medicine Student Bursary, British Medical Association Student Bursary, New Zealand Medical Association Leadership Award, Doctors’ Health Advisory Service Grant, and University of Otago Faculty of Medicine Travel Grant to support travel to, registration at and accommodation during scientific conferences.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Singh G, Hankins M, Weinman JA. Does medical school cause health anxiety and worry in medical students? Med Educ 2004; 38: 479-481.
  • 2. Rosal M, Ockene I, Ockene J, et al. A longitudinal study of students’ depression at one medical school. Acad Med 1997; 72: 542-546.
  • 3. Carson AJ, Dias S, Johnston A, et al. Mental health in medical students. A case control study using the 60 item General Health Questionnaire. Scot Med J 2000; 45: 115-116.
  • 4. Aktekin M, Karaman T, Senol Y, et al. Anxiety, depression and stressful life events among medical students: a prospective study in Antalya, Turkey. Med Educ 2001; 35: 12-17.
  • 5. Henning K, Ey S, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the imposter phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Med Educ 1998; 32: 456-464.
  • 6. Toews JA, Lockyer JM, Dobson DJ, et al. Stress among residents, medical students, and graduate science (MSc/PhD) students. Acad Med 1993; 68 (10 Suppl): S46-S48.
  • 7. Toews JA, Lockyer JM, Dobson DJ, et al. Analysis of stress levels among medical students, residents, and graduate students at four Canadian schools of medicine. Acad Med 1997; 72: 997-1002.
  • 8. Psujek JK, Martz DM, Curtin L, et al. Gender differences in the association among nicotine dependence, body image, depression, and anxiety within a college population. Addict Behav 2004; 29: 375-380.
  • 9. Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Stress and depression among medical students: a cross-sectional study. Med Educ 2005; 39: 594-604.
  • 10. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1613-1622.
  • 11. Clark DC, Daugherty SR, Zeldow PB, et al. The relationship between academic performance and severity of depressed mood during medical school. Compr Psychiatry 1988; 29: 409-420.
  • 12. Kari K, Reidar T, Arnstein F, et al. Life satisfaction and resilience in medical school — a six-year longitudinal, nationwide and comparative study. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6: 48.
  • 13. Givens J, Tjia J. Depressed medical students’ use of mental health services and barriers to use. Acad Med 2002; 77: 918-921.
  • 14. Dyrbye L, Thomas M, Shanafelt T. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among US and Canadian medical students. Acad Med 2006; 81: 354-374.
  • 15. Shanafelt TD, Bradley KA, Wipf JE, Back AL. Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 358-367.
  • 16. Ball S, Bax A. Self-care in medical education: effectiveness of health-habits interventions for first-year medical students. Acad Med 2002; 77: 911-917.
  • 17. Gutgesell M, Reeve R, Parsons B, et al. Exercise and alcohol consumption among medical students. Acad Med 1999; 74: 750-751.
  • 18. Hojat M, Robeson M, Damjanov I, et al. Students’ psychosocial characteristics as predictors of academic performance in medical school. Acad Med 1993; 68: 635-637.
  • 19. Hays LR, Cheever TC, Patel P. Medical student suicide 1989–1994. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 553-555.
  • 20. Aubrey R. International students on campus: a challenge for counsellors, medical providers, and clinicians. Smith Coll Stud Soc Work 1991; 62: 20-33.
  • 21. Rai G. Meeting the educational needs of international students. Int Soc Work 2002; 45: 21-33.
  • 22. Hyun J, Quin B, Madon T, et al. Mental health need, awareness, and use of counselling services among international graduate students. J Am Coll Health 2007; 56: 109-118.
  • 23. Corrigan PW, Penn DL. Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Am Psychol 1999; 54: 765-776.
  • 24. Roberts LW, Hardee JT, Franchini G, et al. Medical students as patients: a pilot study of their health care needs, practices and concerns. Acad Med 1996; 71: 1225-1232.
  • 25. Australian Medical Council. Assessment and accreditation of medical schools: standards and procedures. Part 2. Educational standards. Canberra: AMC, 2007: 26. http://www.amc. (accessed Dec 2009).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.